Friday, December 25, 2009

Federal Government Christmas Card To Taxpayers




www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Obamas-greatest-accomplishment-keeps-costing-you-more-80085742.html


If Obama is going to piggyback on one of his predecessor's accomplishments, he might have picked one that people like.

www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BN2ZI20091224
 http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BN2ZI20091224
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?order=A
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/07/jpmorgan-ceo-jamie-dimon-donat.html
U.S.gave ve up billions in tax money in deal for Citigroup’s bailout repayment
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/15/AR2009121504534.html?hpid=topnews
http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-citigroup-does-the-impossible-it-screws-us-taxpayers-again-2009-12
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/04/summers/
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/07/president-obamas-favorite-banker.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/business/19dimon.html
www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellou

“It’s a p.r. stunt,” says an executive at one of the banks that will be getting a dressing-down at the White House meeting. Executives from Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are expected to be among those in attendance.

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1947411,00.html#ixzz0aFudYQLF
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obama_s-pick-for-man-of-the-year_-George-W_-Bush-8677553-79997637.html
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/21/baracks-wall-street-problem-is-now-americas/
http://www.examiner.com/x-/x-17078-Lafayette-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m9d9-Fascism-Goldman-Sacks-and-The-Federal-Reserve-vying-to-manipulate-the-planet
http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/2009/12/25/u-s-mortgage-giants-may-getter-bigger-still/
http://www.thedailybell.com/681/Nelson-Hultberg-The-Fed-is-a-Fascist-Cartel.html
motherjones.com/politics/2010/01/too-big-jail
www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout






Wednesday, December 23, 2009

How Do You Know It's Love? (1950)






Flashback to a different era here is an educational video from 1950. My how things have changed! Imagine young people discussing different kinds of Love and things like how they get along with one another taking place today. Today most are only taught about Birth Control and STD's.  No thought is given to long term consequences. I thought it was interesting and I hope you enjoy it.



Watch How Do You Know It's Love? (1950) in Educational |




Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Ft. Hood Shooter a Terrorist and this Retired General tells it like it is!




Now  here is a man who tells it like it is that political correctness is destroying our country and leaving our soldiers and citizens vulnerable. He is a Christian and talks about the persecution he received for openly saying so and how the persecution of Christians  is acceptable but no one wants to offend a Muslim.  We have been infiltrated from within and the Army better start dealing with the problems before another Terrorist attack takes place. Better wake up America this is a slippery slope and you are losing your Liberty and your freedom of speech!



Meanwhile the Terrorist scumbag Muslim Killer is whining about his rights being violated!

http://defenseofcapitalism.blogspot.com/2009/12/is-case-for-liberty-too-extreme-by.html
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/headlines/2009/12/ft-hood-shooters-attorney-claims-hasans-religious-rights-violated/

RFID VERICHIP COMMERCIAL STILL THINK IT'S NOT REAL?







If it's not real they wouldn't be advertising it so here it is see for yourself...








Verichip is going into the credit business. They can check your medical records, your credit rating, and confirm your personal identity from a chip implant.
Cities are using chips to track individuals’ garbage disposal and recycling.
Hewlitt Packard is developing the “Central Nervous System for the Earth,”a worldwide sensory array to track everything that moves.
A ray gun that paralyzes people and a ray gun that speaks in your ear.
Intel wants chip implants by 2020 to replace smart phones and mechanical interface devices.
Toyota has developed a wheelchair that is controlled by brainwaves.
In the future more objects will be controlled by brainwaves. That includes you.

Monday, December 21, 2009

Detroit, a tribute to liberal failure (Steven Crowder Video)





Take a look at the future of America at the hands of Democratic leadership!

object>
In this morning The Gartman Letter, analyst Dennis Gartman segues off his usual topic of markets to focus on poverty levels and the political front:
The Gartman Letter: Finally, we came across the following list over the weekend as we were going through e-mails and cleaning things up. We checked out the data, and it is correct, so the “correlation” seems reasonably to hold. Now, what do all of these cities have in common beyond their egregious poverty level rates? They all have had since 1989 and continue to have, Democrat Party mayors… with Cleveland having had the Democrat mayor incumbent for the shortest period, since 1989, while Newark and Milwaukee now go back for nearly one hundred years of Democrat “rule.” Detroit, with the highest poverty rate has had a Democrat running the city government since 1961. We’re not casting aspersions here; we are simply drawing correlations.
Gartman Poverty Levels



In this morning The Gartman Letter, analyst Dennis Gartman segues off his usual topic of markets to focus on poverty levels and the political front:
The Gartman Letter: Finally, we came across the following list over the weekend as we were going through e-mails and cleaning things up. We checked out the data, and it is correct, so the “correlation” seems reasonably to hold.

Now, what do all of these cities have in common beyond their egregious poverty level rates? They all have had since 1989 and continue to have, Democrat Party mayors… with Cleveland having had the Democrat mayor incumbent for the shortest period, since 1989, while Newark and Milwaukee now go back for nearly one hundred years of Democrat “rule.” Detroit, with the highest poverty rate has had a Democrat running the city government since 1961. We’re not casting aspersions here; we are simply drawing correlations.

Gartman Poverty Levels

Sunday, December 20, 2009

You vote obama care - we'll vote you outta there!


It's coming Change nobody believes in.

The American people have overwhelmingly said they do not want obama care but they seem
intent on forcing it on us anyway and will send you to prison if you do not comply. Totalitarian
liberals well you might be able to force this on us but this song tells it like it is...


And this article from the Examiner poses some interesting thoughts.

Now that we know that the Democratic leadership in Congress and the Obama Administration have bribed Senator Ben Nelson into supporting the government takeover of healthcare, the question arises, who ARE these people, anyway?

Are they aliens from outer space? They certainly don't act like normal human beings who are fully aware of reality.

Senator Ben Nelson, for example, will vote in favor of the mammoth, debt-busting monstrosity in spite of the fact that in the latest poll Nebraskans indicate by a 61% majority that they will vote against Nelson if he votes in favor of this bill.

Nelson isn't the only one bribed by the Democratic leadership in Congress and the White House. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana is another, and word has come today via Mitch McConnell that Vermont got a sweet deal in order to secure the support of one of its Senators, more than likely the Socialist Bernie Sanders, who made noises about opposing the measure because it 'didn't go far enough.'

Why would elected representatives vote in support of a piece of legislation that is so clearly unpopular with the people back home?

If we were speaking of true statesmen here, we could surmise they are putting the good of the country ahead of personal gain. But immediately we know that such a theory is false. These 'tax whores' have just accepted multi-millions of dollars in order to support the measure. So much for putting country ahead of self.

The only other alternative theory that has any validity is that in order for a corrupt elected official to be willing to risk their re-election chances and put their entire careers on the line, the consequences of failing to please the voters are not as great as the consequences of failing to please the Democratic leadership, the White House, and especially the big money funding them behind the scenes.

And who is the 'big money?'

We have named them before. George Soros wants this bill passed. The Tides Foundation wants this bill passed. Apollo wants this bill passed. ACORN and SEIU want this bill passed.

And who is a part of each of these organizations? We have named them before as well. Self-avowed Marxists/Maoists/Socialists/Communists that have been in and out of the Obama Administration, such as Jeff Jones, Van Jones, Anita Dunn, Mark Lloyd, Cass Sunstein, John Holdren, Valerie Jarrett, and many more.

These groups are well-funded and will stop at nothing to ram their extremist agenda down the throats of the American people. Former 1960s radical -turned-Patriot David Horowitz knows these people very well. As an anti-American insider back in the days when 1960s radicalism flourished on college campuses, Horowitz states that it has been the goal of these 'progressives' all along to reach this critical point in history--a 'perfect storm' of sorts--when they can force the American social, political, and economic system into collapse and usher in a new America based upon Marxism/Maoism/Stalinism.

Horowitz has the goods on these scumbags. And yes, he names the names. He even unmasks President Barack Hussein Obama.

Given that the American government is now firmly in the grip of usurpers with loads of money, who have bribed and bought off scores of elected officials, the question is, what are the citizens going to do about it?

Patriots CANNOT stand by and watch this great nation continue to fall under the control of these scoundrels.

http://www.examiner.com/x-3704-Columbia-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m12d19-Healthcare-bribeswho-are-these-people-anyway

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704398304574598130440164954.html

Friday, December 18, 2009

Rarely Seen Blonde African Antelope


U.N. Secretary Admits Climate Pact will be Enforced by Global Government


Well this is interesting now it is the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon admitting the goal of Climate Gate is World Government. But for those who may have forgotten or never known in the first place Gore has already said the same thing.

"Former Vice President Al Gore declared that the Congressional climate bill will help bring about “global governance.”
But it is the awareness itself that will drive the change and one of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements.” (Editor's Note: Gore makes the “global governance” comment at the 1min. 10 sec. mark in this UK Times video.)
“I bring you good news from the U.S., “Gore said on July 7, 2009 in Oxford at the Smith School World Forum on Enterprise and the Environment, sponsored by UK Times."

United Nations General Secretary is publicly admitting that the worldwide climate change treaty will be enforced by global government. Up until now, many have dismissed reports that the treaty being discussed in Copenhagen would represent a giant step towards world government.

However, when the head of the United Nations tells an interviewer for the
Los Angeles Times that "we will establish a global governance structure to monitor and manage the implementation of this", what are we all supposed to think?

In fact, a former official in the Thatcher administration, Lord Christopher Monckton, has seen a draft of the treaty being discussed and he says
that it creates 700 new bureaucracies which will implement and enforce the provisions of the climate change treaty. These bureaucracies will have power to enforce the new world environmental laws that supersedes the authority of national governments around the world.

They are already FIGHTING over how to divvy up your tax dollars! From the agreement reached in Copenhagen...

It would kick off with $US10 billion ($A11.28 billion) a year from 2010 to 2012, climbing to $US50 billion ($A56.39 billion) annually by 2015 and $US100 billion ($A112.78 billion) by 2020.

On another critical issue, the draft calls for transforming the political accord and relevant UN texts into a binding treaty within six months.

Fortunately, it appears that a formal treaty will not be signed in Copenhagen. However, Ban Ki-Moon is hopeful that a "binding political deal" will be signed.

So what is the difference between a "
treaty" (obamageddon's powers are broader then you think!) and a "binding political deal"?

That is a good question.

Ban Ki-Moon put it this way during his interview with the Los Angeles Times in response to a question of whether or not a political deal in Copenhagen is still possible....

We need to have a very strong, robust, binding political deal that will have an immediate operational effect. This is not going to be a political declaration, just for the sake of declaration. It is going to be a binding political deal, which will lead to a legally binding treaty next year.

However, Ban Ki-Moon does expect a final climate change treaty to be signed by mid-2010.

What most people do not realize is that the
treaty being discussed in Copenhagen will institute new world taxes which would transfer wealth from "rich nations" as payment for the "carbon debt" that we have accumulated.

Ban Ki-Moon also commented on this during his interview with the L.A. Times....

Developed countries have political and moral responsibilities, therefore they have to do more, first of all by coming out with ambitious targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and they should be prepared to provide financial support.

We have pretty good agreement on short-term, fast-track financial support in the order of $10 billion for the coming three years. When we agree on a politically binding agreement, this will have immediate operational effect, including financial support from next year.

This financial support will reportedly be ongoing for the life of the treaty.

So when will the treaty end?

Can the United States ever get out of it?

Well, reports from those who have seen the draft treaty indicate that the only way a nation can leave the treaty is if every single other nation agrees.

Now, if "developing nations" are receiving large payments from the United States every single year, how likely do you think it is for every single one of them to vote to allow the U.S. to leave the treaty?

The truth is that the treaty is structured so that the United States would be committed to it forever. According to the draft treaty being considered, no future president or Congress would be able to do anything to get the United States out of the treaty. The only way to get out of it would be a unanimous vote from every single one of the other nations.

This is the kind of deal that Barack Obama wants to lock the United States into and
HERE is another plan in the works to redistribute your hard earned money. Fox news has also obtained
THIS (pdf) report titled The Belgrade Process - Moving forward with developing a set of options of International Environmental Governance. It outlines the plans and lays out the timeline for global governance.

What a nightmare.

BREAKING NEWS: Sydney Morning Herald reports 11th hour Copenhagen deal forged





The Green Nazi Hell and America’s Future?  


I suggest you read it now that the Fascist liberals fully intend to force this upon you let me see if I have this straight we get to borrow money from the worlds largest polluters China to give China money not to pollute and we are already broke and with interest on that debt so obama and his banker buddies and people like gore and the banks can make billions....


Leaders and ministers from about 30 countries hammered out an outline climate accord early on Friday morning, hours before some 130 world leaders were to gather in a summit.
The three-hour session ended at about 2.30am, leaving top advisers to work out the final language of the draft agreement on how to tame global warming and help poor countries cope with its impacts.
Advisers resumed work almost immediately to craft a document that could be presented to heads of state and government at 8am.
"We tried to find an umbrella political accord, if you like," said Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, who also holds the rotating presidency of the European Union.
"We tried to advance the main points and have asked the 'sherpas' to work on the text through the night so we can discuss them tomorrow morning," he told reporters, speaking in Swedish.
"We've had a very constructive dialogue," said Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen.
"We're not there yet at all. But in order to achieve as much as possible, I decided ... to invite representatives of the regional groups to a meeting where we discussed how we could make progress," he told reporters.
The declaration will likely call for preventing global temperatures from going up more than 2.0 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial times, according to a participant in the meeting.
Small island nations, their very existence threatened by rising seas, have called for a cap of 1.5 degrees.
It will also tally up the pledges from rich nations on cutting greenhouse gases by 2020, and propose a target for all countries by mid-century.
On financing for the poor countries most vulnerable to the ravages of climate change, it crystallised a consensus that has formed in the previous two days of the troubled UN talks.
It would kick off with $US10 billion ($A11.28 billion) a year from 2010 to 2012, climbing to $US50 billion ($A56.39 billion) annually by 2015 and $US100 billion ($A112.78 billion) by 2020.
The text also proposes a range of innovative mechanisms for raising the money, ranging from a tax on air and sea transports fuels to a tax on financial transfers.
On another critical issue, the draft calls for transforming the political accord and relevant UN texts into a binding treaty within six months.
If the declaration is accepted at the summit, negotiators will then transpose its objectives into the texts that have laboriously emerged over two years of negotiations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
Poor nations have complained bitterly over the course of the 12-day talks in Copenhagen, steered by the host country Denmark, about being locked out of key meetings, an objection that could resurface on Friday.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Brazilian President Inacio Lula da Silva all took part in the talks.
Ethiopia's Meles Zenawi, Mexico's Felipe Calderon, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, and the European Commission's Jose Manuel Barroso were also present.
Among industrialised countries, the other participants were Australia, Norway, Russia, Spain, Poland and Japan.
Representing small island states were the Maldives and Grenada, with Sudan, Algeria, Ethiopia, Lesotho and Gabon from Africa.
Sudan is also the leader of the G77 group of 130 developed countries, Algeria heads the Africa Group, and Lesotho leads the bloc of Least Developed Countries.
Other major emerging economies present included China, India and South Africa. Besides Brazil, other countries in which deforestation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions include Colombia and Indonesia.
Rounding out the negotiating group are South Korea, which is not classified as an industrial country within the Kyoto Protocol; and Saudi Arabia, leading producer within OPEC; and Bangladesh.




(Hat Tip Watts Up With That)

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/17/breaking-news-sydney-mo...
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/climate-draf...
http://www.aim.org/aim-report/the-green-nazi-hell-and-america...
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/will_dems_allow_goldman_to_man.html
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?order=A
http://nlpc.org/stories/2009/12/07/goldman-sachs-challenged-embrace-global-warming-wake-‘climategate’
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout/print
http://www.commodityonline.com/news/China-lead-top-ten-carbon-emitters-of-the-world-23854-3-1.html
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/al-gore-the-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/19220501/


THANK YOU SUCKERS!

It certainly is a big power game ... the fund will run into billions and getting to control it will mean you will be powerful in the world order 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8419048.stm